Google Scholar – a vast database of state and federal case legislation, which is searchable by keyword, phrase, or citations. Google Scholar also allows searchers to specify which level of court cases to search, from federal, to specific states.
Article 199 of your Constitution allows High Court intervention only when "no other satisfactory remedy is provided by regulation." It is actually perfectly-settled that an aggrieved person must exhaust available remedies before invoking High Court jurisdiction, regardless of whether These remedies suit them. The doctrine of exhaustion of remedies prevents unnecessary High Court litigation. Read more
However, decisions rendered from the Supreme Court in the United States are binding on all federal courts, and on state courts regarding issues in the Constitution and federal law.
We make no warranties or guarantees about the precision, completeness, or adequacy with the information contained on this site, or even the information linked to within the state site. Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can create inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
The official court record is maintained with the court of record. Copies of case file documents are not offered on the search site and will need for being ordered from the court of record.
In order to preserve a uniform enforcement with the laws, the legal system adheres for the doctrine of stare decisis
27 . Const. P. 4002/2011 (D.B.) Ibrahim Noor V/S Pakistan International Airlines Corporation & Ors. Sindh High Court, Karachi Even, if a petitioner was acquitted in the criminal case following a conviction, in NAB Reference No. 20/2011, this does not automatically lead to exoneration from departmental charges based over the same factual grounds. While a writ under Article 199 is on the market in specific limited situations, it can be generally not the suitable remedy to contest a dismissal from service based on these charges, particularly when the employee was afforded a full possibility to cross-study witnesses and present his/her defense but didn't encourage the department of his/her innocence.
eleven . Const. P. 1479/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Shir Bano and another V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi Primarily, this is a free and democratic nation, and once a person becomes a major she or he can marry whosoever he/she likes; If your parents of your boy or Woman will not approve of this kind of inter-caste or interreligious marriage the maximum they can do if they're able to Lower off social relations with the son or even the daughter, Nevertheless they cannot give threats or commit or instigate for acts of violence and cannot harass the person who undergoes these kinds of inter-caste or inter-religious marriage. I therefore, direct that the administration/police authorities will see, if any boy or Woman that is major undergoes inter-caste or inter-religious marriage with a woman or gentleman who's a major, the couple is neither harassed by anyone nor subjected to threats or acts of violence and anyone who provides these threats or harasses or commits acts of violence both himself or at his instigation, is taken to activity by instituting criminal proceedings via the police against these persons and further stern action is taken against these person(s) as provided by legislation.
Summaries offer concise insights into the legal principles governing agreements between parties, such as the formation, interpretation, and enforceability of contracts, giving a worthwhile resource for understanding contractual rights and obligations.
The legislation of necessity acknowledged and upheld by Pakistan's highest judicial body has proved an honorable protection for military adventure in civil government.it absolutely was the illegal action called law of necessity..
Therefore, this petition is hereby disposed of from the terms stated above. However no harassment shall be caused to both party as well as the case shall be decided because of the competent court of law if pending. Read more
These lists are sorted chronologically by Chief Justice and incorporate all notable cases decided because of the court. Articles exist for almost all cases.
seventeen . Const. P. five/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Nasira Khalique Thr. Ms. Seema Khalique V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2025 SHC KHI forty six I have listened to the uncovered counsel for the parties and perused the record with their assistance. I intentionally not making any detail comments as being the issues in the matter between the parties pending adjudication before the concerned court with regard for the interim relief application in terms of Section seven(1) with the Illegal Dispossession Act 2005 at hand over possession of your subjected premises into the petitioner; that Illegal Dispossession Case needs to be decided by the competent court after hearing the parties if pending since the petitioner has already sought a similar prayer in the Illegal Dispossession case and so far as the restoration of possession of concerned the trial court should see this factor for interim custody of the topic premises In the event the petitioner was found forcibly evicted from the premises in question if she possessed the valid rent agreement and decision be made within two months here from the date of receipt of this order. Read more
The Court directed the Chief Secretary of Sindh to make sure the Act's effective implementation in line with its first purpose and called for educational programs Bachelor degree(s) in the topic of cooperative societies. Read more